4 ms·
not just wobbly but what small drone enthusiasts call "jello", significantly lower video quality than like a $399 dji mini 2 it is cheap and non gimbal stabili
by walrus01 5y ago
not just wobbly but what small drone enthusiasts call "jello", significantly lower video quality than like a $399 dji mini 2
it is cheap and non gimbal stabilized, so can't expect much more
- marwis 5y agoAre there no better digital stabilization algorithms? This seems like it could be fixed in post processing on your phone/cloud.
- walrus01 5y agothere absolutely are, without a gimbal, by using a somewhat large sensor and movement/orientation/inertia sensor ICs to perform a software crop and stabilization as the video is recorded. such as the hypersmooth 2.0 or hypersmooth 3.0 on a gopro hero9 black/hero10 etc. but those are considerably more expensive cameras. search youtube for gopro hypersmooth 3.0 and you'll see some examples of the same gopro with and without hypersmooth turned on.
- WrtCdEvrydy 5y agoI've used Mercalli to fix this in post-processing but it's not a simple fix. This is caused by a non-global shutter so you have to spend a lot of processing power to fix it.
- saidinesh5 5y agoA recent, but really good, open source one is https://gyroflow.xyz/ https://gyroflow.xyz/ . There's also Reelsteady, Hyperflow etc..
- tomtheelder 5y agoI mean yeah, it's about half the price of a DJI Mini 2 ($449 v $230). You'd expect it to perform worse. It seems totally reasonable for people who just want to take some shots for their snapchat story but aren't really interested in having a real drone.
- samatman 5y agoThe Mini SE is readily available for $299 and I don't think even the Snap demographic is going to find that a camera with no gimbal is acceptable for the application. I'm not predicting whether it will sell or not, I'm bad at that, but it's just not a lot of drone for the price.