4 ms·
That's weird. They don't bill for logs per GB/line, iirc, so from a financial perspective it seems an odd choice - it will cost them lots of money to just pile
by sofixa 5y ago
That's weird. They don't bill for logs per GB/line, iirc, so from a financial perspective it seems an odd choice - it will cost them lots of money to just pile on lots of logs from users/companies who didn't ask for it ( if they needed them they would have enabled the feature themselves).
- ibz 5y agoHow if they are planning to mine and sell data?
- magundu 5y agoI don’t think the will do it. The reason may be logs can contribute to lot of ingestion volume compared APM, RUM, Infra products. They make lot of money in this case.
- krono 5y agoAny recent changes to their data processing terms that could explain this? Just thinking out loud, I'm personally not familiar with this service.
- beberlei 5y agotheir current pricing works based on ingested data in GB. I suppose logs falls under that.