3 ms·

wobbly: https://videos.ctfassets.net/svn43w404u4n/4oG6RAF5QALMWEBdlXbeE6/05baa291923347887b85bd99802d2eff/Product_Desktop_Mobile_H264_1080p_RF_23.mp4 https://v

wobbly: https://videos.ctfassets.net/svn43w404u4n/4oG6RAF5QALMWEBdlXbeE6/05baa291923347887b85bd99802d2eff/Product_Desktop_Mobile_H264_1080p_RF_23.mp4 https://videos.ctfassets.net/svn43w404u4n/4oG6RAF5QALMWEBdlX...

walrus01 4y ago
not just wobbly but what small drone enthusiasts call "jello", significantly lower video quality than like a $399 dji mini 2 it is cheap and non gimbal stabilized, so can't expect much more
- marwis 4y ago
  Are there no better digital stabilization algorithms? This seems like it could be fixed in post processing on your phone/cloud.
  - walrus01 4y ago
    there absolutely are, without a gimbal, by using a somewhat large sensor and movement/orientation/inertia sensor ICs to perform a software crop and stabilization as the video is recorded. such as the hypersmooth 2.0 or hypersmooth 3.0 on a gopro hero9 black/hero10 etc. but those are considerably more expensive cameras. search youtube for gopro hypersmooth 3.0 and you'll see some examples of the same gopro with and without hypersmooth turned on.
  - WrtCdEvrydy 4y ago
    I've used Mercalli to fix this in post-processing but it's not a simple fix. This is caused by a non-global shutter so you have to spend a lot of processing power to fix it.
  - saidinesh5 4y ago
    A recent, but really good, open source one is https://gyroflow.xyz/ https://gyroflow.xyz/ . There's also Reelsteady, Hyperflow etc..
- tomtheelder 4y ago
  I mean yeah, it's about half the price of a DJI Mini 2 ($449 v $230). You'd expect it to perform worse. It seems totally reasonable for people who just want to take some shots for their snapchat story but aren't really interested in having a real drone.
  - samatman 4y ago
    The Mini SE is readily available for $299 and I don't think even the Snap demographic is going to find that a camera with no gimbal is acceptable for the application. I'm not predicting whether it will sell or not, I'm bad at that, but it's just not a lot of drone for the price.
Thorrez 4y ago
Where is that video from?
mygoodaccount 4y ago
sauce on this succubus?

walrus01 4y ago

not just wobbly but what small drone enthusiasts call "jello", significantly lower video quality than like a $399 dji mini 2 it is cheap and non gimbal stabilized, so can't expect much more

marwis 4y ago
Are there no better digital stabilization algorithms? This seems like it could be fixed in post processing on your phone/cloud.
- walrus01 4y ago
  there absolutely are, without a gimbal, by using a somewhat large sensor and movement/orientation/inertia sensor ICs to perform a software crop and stabilization as the video is recorded. such as the hypersmooth 2.0 or hypersmooth 3.0 on a gopro hero9 black/hero10 etc. but those are considerably more expensive cameras. search youtube for gopro hypersmooth 3.0 and you'll see some examples of the same gopro with and without hypersmooth turned on.
- WrtCdEvrydy 4y ago
  I've used Mercalli to fix this in post-processing but it's not a simple fix. This is caused by a non-global shutter so you have to spend a lot of processing power to fix it.
- saidinesh5 4y ago
  A recent, but really good, open source one is https://gyroflow.xyz/ https://gyroflow.xyz/ . There's also Reelsteady, Hyperflow etc..
tomtheelder 4y ago
I mean yeah, it's about half the price of a DJI Mini 2 ($449 v $230). You'd expect it to perform worse. It seems totally reasonable for people who just want to take some shots for their snapchat story but aren't really interested in having a real drone.
- samatman 4y ago
  The Mini SE is readily available for $299 and I don't think even the Snap demographic is going to find that a camera with no gimbal is acceptable for the application. I'm not predicting whether it will sell or not, I'm bad at that, but it's just not a lot of drone for the price.

Thorrez 4y ago

Where is that video from?

mygoodaccount 4y ago

sauce on this succubus?