I've found Go's compromises help good programmers too over the long run. It isn't lowering the variance by slowing down the quick, it does it by shrinking the

I've found Go's compromises help good programmers too over the long run. It isn't lowering the variance by slowing down the quick, it does it by shrinking the space of possible solutions. Bad programmers and good programmers wind up making similar "good enough" design choices. You don't wind up with over engineered frameworks for every bit of logic in you backend.