Point taken that their scope is more broad than food tox, but again, read their description of what they publish and then ask yourself whether safety profiles o

Point taken that their scope is more broad than food tox, but again, read their description of what they publish and then ask yourself whether safety profiles of vaccines fit into that description. You can do one better - search their records for all of the prior safety work they've done on vaccines: https://www.sciencedirect.com/search?qs=vaccine&pub=Food%20and%20Chemical%20Toxicology&cid=271257&date=1995-2019&show=100 https://www.sciencedirect.com/search?qs=vaccine&pub=Food%20a... Given that they have absolutely no history of assessing overall vaccine safety or toxicology, how prepared do you think they are to appropriately assess this one? Do you think the reviewers who work with this journal have the expertise to properly weight the claims in the submitted paper? Vaccine safety research is published in vaccine journals, or medical journals, or infectious disease journals, or immunology journals, or rheumatology journals because those journals all have experts that can actually critically review the submissions. When people publish 'controversial' research for a field of study, in a journal outside the scope of that field, they're promoting nonsense ~100% of the time.