3 ms·
If this is true ("only b/c of melting ice sheet; will dissipate in next few thousand years") then wouldn't we expect water levels to be continuously dropping? S
by throwaway894345 5y ago
If this is true ("only b/c of melting ice sheet; will dissipate in next few thousand years") then wouldn't we expect water levels to be continuously dropping? Seems more likely that they exist because rain/meltwater makes its way to the basin and keeps them filled (irrespective of whether or not they were originally filled with meltwater from the ice sheet 15kya).
- cmrdporcupine 5y agoI believe a lot of it is ultimately fed by hundreds of thousands of square kilometers of smaller lakes upstream. The Canadian Shield is dotted with gazillions of lakes, it's crazy to fly over it. And I think it's safe to assume most of those lakes are glacial remnant water, not sure if they're fully refreshed by rain and snow.
- throwaway894345 5y agoThen I would expect these upstream lakes to be shrinking as of the last 10-15kya.
- bregma 5y agoI know it's the internet and facts are as real as birds, but just in case you want some: [0]. [0] https://www.lre.usace.army.mil/Missions/Great-Lakes-Information/Great-Lakes-Information-2/Basin-Conditions/ https://www.lre.usace.army.mil/Missions/Great-Lakes-Informat...
- garbagetime 5y agoThat's a pretty unecsscesary footnote
- maxerickson 5y agoThe watershed(s) aren't crazy huge: https://project.geo.msu.edu/geogmich/watershed.html https://project.geo.msu.edu/geogmich/watershed.html (Like just as a gut check, much of the border of Wisconsin and Minnesota is a tributary of the Mississippi River)
- kevin_thibedeau 5y agoOntario is filled to record high levels now because the inflow exceeds what is lost to the St. lawrence and evaporation.