3 ms·
Pure garbage masquerading as science. Take a look at the kinds of claims the paper makes at first. Then stop for a second. Now imagine how someone doing real s
by doesnotexist 4y ago
Pure garbage masquerading as science.
Take a look at the kinds of claims the paper makes at first. Then stop for a second. Now imagine how someone doing real science might try to prove such a claim. Now scan the paper looking for any thing even remotely reminiscent of evidence for the claim and you won't find it.
Also consider this nugget: "The increasing evidence that the vaccines do little to control disease spread"
According to this, there were 11,000 Covid-19 vaccine papers published in 2021.
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-03686-xA https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-03686-xA
On balance where do you suspect the evidence falls?
- yucky 4y ago>Now imagine how someone doing real science might try to prove such a claim. I imagine someone "doing real science" wouldn't destroy their own control groups, would they? https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2021/02/19/969143015/long-term-studies-of-covid-19-vaccines-hurt-by-placebo-recipients-getting-immuni https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2021/02/19/9691430...