4 ms·
> ... it includes one of the worst actors during the entire pandemic )(McCullough[1] You mean one of the most highly credentialled and most demonized expert du
by loceng 5y ago
> ... it includes one of the worst actors during the entire pandemic )(McCullough[1]
You mean one of the most highly credentialled and most demonized expert during the pandemic?
- mikeyouse 5y agoYes yes, repeatedly pushing for HCQ even in 2021, claiming there's no evidence of asymptomatic spread, claiming you can't be reinfected with Covid, and claiming there were "tens of thousands" of vaccination deaths -- all of which came after substantial evidence to the contrary is something an expert, and not a hack would do.
- loceng 4y agoDidn't see your reply until now. Watch these, focus on refuting the content of their claims, not reacting to the names involved - as you've clearly bought into the smear campaign and other propaganda/misinformation: 5+ hour long discussion by highly credentialed domain experts not toeing the line: "COVID-19: A Second Opinion" - https://rumble.com/vt62y6-covid-19-a-second-opinion.html https://rumble.com/vt62y6-covid-19-a-second-opinion.html (discussion from experts begins around 40 minute mark) If that's too long for you to start, here's a 38 minute summary version for you to start with: https://rumble.com/vtamrn-covid-19-a-second-opinion-shorter-highlight-video.html https://rumble.com/vtamrn-covid-19-a-second-opinion-shorter-... I'm guessing you're the type of person to not actually watch things like this "because they're all quacks!" anyway, am I right?