This is horse radish. There is an argument that NATO expansion drove Russia away from the rest of Europe, maybe it was also US engagement in Ukraine which was m

This is horse radish. There is an argument that NATO expansion drove Russia away from the rest of Europe, maybe it was also US engagement in Ukraine which was misunderstood or perhaps not. Perhaps there are domestic forces pushing Russia to war, but it was certainly not Merkel and her policies. Germany was an escalating factor in the conflict between western nations and Russia. That has evaporated now of course and I don't really see how this conflict could end until Putin says he had enough. I hope Kaczynski and Zelensky have a significantly better judgement of the political realities in Europe if they believe Merkels decision on the point of nuclear energy is in any way relevant. Their countries have to build a relationship with Russia at some point. Furthermore the article completely neglects the economic realities of nuclear power and downplays possible danger. I think it was this or last year the first permanent storage went online, either Finland or Sweden. Would have to check if it really happened or additional problems surfaced. There is also a dependence on Uranium as fuel. Could ask Putin for that too. Sure maybe Canada could help out. I think more political experience and restraint could have prevented a war. Was Putin justified to invade Ukraine? Certainly not. > the Fukushima disaster should not have happened in the first place. Well...