3 ms·

Until now it hasn't been a problem? And if the deal falls through then the cryptoscams are still OK, I assume?

• rvz 5y ago
  There you go. But universally it is more got to do with this: [0] its not just Twitter. But the contents of the article suggests that the author has a problem with Elon for some strange reason since they think it is now a problem. It's also especially too early to call it 'Elon Musk's Twitter' since the deal is not yet finalised. Even before that, Twitter hasn't really done anything significant to reduce the crypto-scam tweets. Let's wait until the deal is officially finalized first before we talking about 'Elon Musk's Twitter'. [0] https://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/scam-adverts-online-safety-bill-b2031739.html https://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/scam-adverts-online...
  • McLaren_Ferrari 5y ago
    > But the contents of the article suggests that the author has a problem with Elon for some strange reason since they think it is now a problem. Musk is a divisive individual. People who go that route consciously do so because they figure that they'll just surround themselves with those who love them and try to convert those who hate them. The conversion part never works on a large scale but the controversial individual finds its comfort zone surrounded by those who love them and should become more moderate in time. This usually happens as they realize that those who love them are in love with the character, not the person, so they intentionally deflate the character they built to see who stays and who leaves.