You know, there's credible and rational claims one can make to justify an overall negative perception of "crypto". To be skeptical of it, at the very least. It

You know, there's credible and rational claims one can make to justify an overall negative perception of "crypto". To be skeptical of it, at the very least. It is however concerning how of all people, a computer science student at a technical university is so closed minded, emotional, and primitive in their conclusions. Blockchains are insecure because I say they are. Scams and stuff. I've Googled for 3 scam cases so it's only scams. Let me link you further into 3 other crypto hate blogs as "research". Every new crypto project is useless nonsense. I've actually never used a single one of them, don't have any idea what they're about or how any of them works, but they're useless. It's not that any of these sweeping conclusions are fully false. And with proper research one might come to similar yet probably more nuanced conclusions, the issue is that no case is made at all. It's a narrative with zero substance. If you're going to do that, at least be efficient about it: just write "crypto sucks" as headline and publish.