2 ms·
That's the opposite of protecting the freedom, as with such legislation you're limiting people's freedom to enter contracts of their own choosing.
by golergka 5y ago
That's the opposite of protecting the freedom, as with such legislation you're limiting people's freedom to enter contracts of their own choosing.
- npteljes 5y agoYeah that's true. Ideally I'd limit them to the least exploitative contracts possible. My thinking here is inspired by the free software movement, where the basic idea is that by having a specifically limiting license, they enable the greatest freedom for users. With the implied idea being that by having fewer restrictions, the system ends up being more restrictive, instead of less restrictive.