I would tag 1 + 3. The state has obligations to provide infrastructure and legislative boundaries but should otherwise not interfere with the content of educati

I would tag 1 + 3. The state has obligations to provide infrastructure and legislative boundaries but should otherwise not interfere with the content of education. In my country teachers actually are obligated to be neutral and are not allowed to advertise a specific party for example. This overall has a price and I think a regular review of these rules is useful. But the spirit of the law (sometimes more important than the letter of the law in my country) is still sensible in my opinion. All these choices have an influence in one way or another of course.