3 ms·
I think poaching would be making an offer that was forbidden - or that you had signed an agreement to not do. In this case, as presented, there is no such viol
by roedog 15y ago
I think poaching would be making an offer that was forbidden - or that you had signed an agreement to not do. In this case, as presented, there is no such violation. (right to work state, any non-compete agreement had expired, etc).
A losing manager might call it poaching anyways because they wanted to retain the worker - but that would just be hot air.
- michaelochurch 15y agoActually, I would argue that an existing non-compete is a great reason (morally speaking, ignoring pragmatic concerns) to hire someone. Bad rules should be not bent but broken into little pieces.