3 ms·

This is the same as paper reviewers for academic journals. The reviewer are usually authors whose work has been accepted into the journal. And then you build u

This is the same as paper reviewers for academic journals. The reviewer are usually authors whose work has been accepted into the journal. And then you build up better contacts and also you know how the review process works intimately and this are more likely to get papers accepted. (I was published in and then a reviewer for an academic journal.)

thaumasiotes 5y ago
> This is the same as paper reviewers for academic journals. I mean, "this paper does not cite enough of my colleagues" is a common satirical representation of academic journal reviewer feedback.