5 ms·
>is only applicable to certain kinds of changes which make the subject worse off Yes. It's not a difficult concept. Children often get upset about rules that a
by daenz 5y ago
>is only applicable to certain kinds of changes which make the subject worse off
Yes. It's not a difficult concept. Children often get upset about rules that are enforced on them, and feel "worse off." Doesn't mean it's harm. Context matters. The world isn't binary.
Also, it's ok to just disagree, since it's clear we disagree on the definition of harm. No need to start constructing strawmen of my position.
- dragonwriter 5y ago> Children often get upset about rules that are enforced on them, and feel "worse off." Doesn't mean it's harm. Are you saying that losing the benefit of the special district doesn't actually make Disney worse off, and that they are just an immature corporate child lacking the maturity to understand the benefit Daddy DeSantis and Mommy Leg are giving them by taking away their Reedy Creek sucker? Or is this a complete non-sequitur to distract from the fact that Disney would, in fact, be worse off after the change?
- daenz 5y agoIt's not actually harm, yes, that's what I have been saying. For the 3rd time, we disagree on the definition of harm. No, that doesn't mean I think you should be allowed to stab people.