> Sounds to me like there are deep corruption problems I consider this to be a flavor of corruption, too, but it isn't, legally. It is the desired outcome for

> Sounds to me like there are deep corruption problems I consider this to be a flavor of corruption, too, but it isn't, legally. It is the desired outcome for many, and for many more, maybe not the outcome they wanted, but the logical outcome of what they asked for. There has been a decades-long process in the US of pressuring governments to do less, to outsource more, to privatize, to move to "public-private partnerships" or whatever new buzzword means socialize losses and privatize profits. And this is what you get - government that doesn't have the capabilities it needs to do what people ask of it. Which makes it look bad, which encourages another cycle of privatization... If you want functional government, stop electing people who promise to break it.