I don't know if this is what you intend to imply, but it sounds like you're justifying the "all coffee makers are fire hazards" rule with an anecdote about a ji

I don't know if this is what you intend to imply, but it sounds like you're justifying the "all coffee makers are fire hazards" rule with an anecdote about a jimmy-rigged coffee maker (which never actually even caught fire, although I wouldn't necessarily be surprised if it would have done). Certainly permitting coffee makers increases the risk of fire above "no coffee makers", but both are in a completely different risk ballpark to "jimmy-rigged coffee makers". I also don't know if coffee makers are expressly forbidden in building codes or if it's just an over-zealous facilities manager policy (and perhaps in either case it's a legacy from a bygone era where these things caught fire more frequently than today).