> My question was whether you used Bayesian reasoning to accept Bayesian reasoning as your epistemology. And I don't think you did. Ah. Yes, I agree. In fact

> My question was whether you used Bayesian reasoning to accept Bayesian reasoning as your epistemology. And I don't think you did. Ah. Yes, I agree. In fact, I very rarely actually do the Bayesian math. My core epistemology is Popperian. > MWI is an example where there isn't a good way to assign a probability, because so far it's not testable. It's even worse than that. One of the predictions of the MWI is that it is not testable! The MWI is "not even wrong".