It seems that they have very little incentive to take risks/deviate from the common path. Why help an outlier patient, when even if their unusual treatment doe

It seems that they have very little incentive to take risks/deviate from the common path. Why help an outlier patient, when even if their unusual treatment doesn't do any harm, it could be wrongfully associated with some random bad outcome? With the system set up like this, game theory basically guarantees we end up with the state as OP describes.