3 ms·
>Medical decisions need to be made outside of cost considerations. It's really jarring to read an otherwise reasonable comment that drops a whopper like this.
by scythe 5y ago
>Medical decisions need to be made outside of cost considerations.
It's really jarring to read an otherwise reasonable comment that drops a whopper like this. Nothing exists outside of cost considerations. The NSA has cost considerations. The Space Shuttle had cost considerations (obviously, not great ones!). The design of nuclear submarines involves cost considerations, however unsettling that may seem. You're telling me that my broken hand needs to be judged outside of cost considerations? Give me a break.
The problem is that there is a lack of "trustworthy" parties to evaluate cost expectations in medicine. The patient often doesn't understand their condition or its treatments, the doctor has a clear perverse incentive to inflate costs, and the insurance company may actually be better off if the patient dies. At least that's the conventional picture. Leftist pundits often complain that the American economy is based on "greed", but a more precise criticism is that there has recently been a trend away from expecting benevolence and for-its-own-sake honesty from anyone under any circumstances, or equivalently an increasing cynicism about human motivations. It remains to be seen whether a medical system can function when nobody expects to trust anyone.
- inglor_cz 5y ago"The Space Shuttle had cost considerations (obviously, not great ones!)." It absolutely did, and great ones too. The program was too costly and never lived up to the original expectations of fast and easy access to orbit. Falcon 9 + Dragon is the first American human-rated launcher and ship that can be labeled as somewhat cost effective.