5 ms·
I agree. At first I thought they would be uniquely positioned for this role, but it really does seem like they need to stay independent to stay objective. As a
by drewzero1 4y ago
I agree. At first I thought they would be uniquely positioned for this role, but it really does seem like they need to stay independent to stay objective. As a customer As a customer I appreciate that ifixit serves the customer's needs rather than Apple's agenda or overall bottom line, which might not have remained the case if they had some kind of partnership.
- webmobdev 4y agoWhy can't they stay independent and objective if they partner with Apple (or any other manufacturer) to sell their parts?
- Retric 4y agoIndependent is often used as a weasel word ie: independent franchises. So sure the could be an independent distributor or whatever but that’s not actually independent as they would have a financial connection. Remaining objective is of course possible even with financial ties, but the suspicion is going to taint people’s perception.
- drewzero1 4y agoIf ifixit were to partner with a manufacturer (and especially one as large and influential as Apple), there might be a perception among consumers (whether true or not) that they were beholden to the manufacturer not to do anything that might hurt that manufacturer's revenue streams, like (for example) providing parts and information to extend the use of obsolete products or criticizing any of the manufacturer's design practices that might be hostile to repair. On the flip side, it might be possible for a partnership to provide better first-party parts support and more complete sharing of information, but I'm just too jaded to believe it could happen that way.
- RC_ITR 4y ago“If you keep rating our phones as very difficult for user repair, then why are we allowing you to distribute parts?”