4 ms·
Sounds like Google Scholar saved the author from being swindled into spending $400 by their dentist. The old thing to do was to get a second opinions. I wonder
by jcranberry 4y ago
Sounds like Google Scholar saved the author from being swindled into spending $400 by their dentist.
The old thing to do was to get a second opinions. I wonder how that would have fared comparatively in this case.
- Zigurd 4y agoThing is, the misinformation was prioritized to the top of the search. Is it the place of online platforms to filter out misinformation?
- crdrost 4y agoI mean in the broadest sense that's a cultural question and most big online platforms have decided that it is their place—Facebook and Twitter in particular—because of pressures from the public. In a much, much narrower sense, we are talking about Google and not an online platform. Google's explicit mission is, “to organize the world's information and make it universally accessible and useful.” Like, filtering out misinformation is literally the thing that Google says is its purpose.