4 ms·
Just thinking out loud, but wouldn't this be best handled with separate commits for each of these atomic changes, with a merge commit describing the intent ins
by darkerside 5y ago
Just thinking out loud, but wouldn't this be best handled with separate commits for each of these atomic changes, with a merge commit describing the intent ins narrative form?
Don't ask me if I practice what I pushed there
- twhitmore 5y agoGood question. The example message is adapted from a fast-moving innovation stream; it's an example of moving quickly and getting a lot of major work done. In a more mature area, pace of work could often be slower and commits more granular. Until it's necessary to refactor/ reengineer things -- then commits are often larger again. That's been my experience anyway, YMMV.
- darkerside 5y agoFair point. We should act appropriately for our context.