> if you're refusing to consider that to be erotica then what does the word even mean to you? I'm not sure why you're on a tangent that is unrelated to what I

> if you're refusing to consider that to be erotica then what does the word even mean to you? I'm not sure why you're on a tangent that is unrelated to what I was talking about. I was referring to the claim that what a culture 2000 years ago considered to be erotica may be completely different to what you consider to be erotica today. Do you disagree that there could be any differences? I've already pointed out that your upbringing and culture is what determines what you think is erotica. For you, the back of a woman's neck is not erotica, for a Japanese person it may be. Do you follow?