> 0.99 recurring is not the same as 1. how can it be? Because 0.99 recurring is another way of writing an infinite series whose sum can be proved to be 1. > 0

> 0.99 recurring is not the same as 1. how can it be? Because 0.99 recurring is another way of writing an infinite series whose sum can be proved to be 1. > 0.99 recurring" is an approximation No, it isn't. See above.