3 ms·
>The argument on Lee not being a traitor is bad and you should feel bad for making it. The argument that it is some sort of obvious black and white issue is ho
by throwaway0a5e 5y ago
>The argument on Lee not being a traitor is bad and you should feel bad for making it.
The argument that it is some sort of obvious black and white issue is horse shit you should feel bad about your ignorance of history. Lee's decision to serve for the confederacy was not morally cut and clear either way at the time. He was both obligated to serve the federal government and obligated to serve his home state. This was obvious to even casual observers and was the subject of much speculation at the time.
To make a comparison that innumerable people seven score and thirteen years ago made, George Washington took half a dozen oaths to serve the crown over the course of his military service prior to the American Revolution yet when his people chose to declare independence he fought on their side.
- chasil 5y agoI don't really know much about Lee, and I have avoided study of the U.S. Civil War (although I did read most of Grant's memoirs, which likely paint a very biased picture). However, if Lee was in a state militia, would he not have pledged loyalty to the governor, and not to the president? This in no way atones for what the Union would see as crime.
- throwaway0a5e 5y agoLee was serving in the US army when war broke out. The Wikipedia page on him is a fine overview of Lee's feelings on the matter.