> The anti trust concern was that they could abuse their position No. The antitrust concern was that they *did* abuse their position to damage the browser mark

> The anti trust concern was that they could abuse their position No. The antitrust concern was that they *did* abuse their position to damage the browser market, which is evidenced by how long IE11 has been around. Luckily the value prop of the web was enough to overcome their strategy. Being a monopoly is not illegal. A company can perfectly legally have a natural monopoly of 100% of a market without being illegal. The problem only comes when they use that position to prevent other competitors from entering the market, or when they use their position to take over other markets.