He only started talking about Bayesianism about 29 minutes in to the podcast. Don't blame him for that... the interviewer asked him all sorts of tangential que

He only started talking about Bayesianism about 29 minutes in to the podcast. Don't blame him for that... the interviewer asked him all sorts of tangential questions before finally asking him about Bayesianism directly. But even some of the earlier things he talks about (particularly Popper's objections to inductivism) are actually relevant to his critique of "Bayesian epistemology", which he claims is "a species of inductivism" (which, to his mind, Popper demolished).