3 ms·
Sir/Madam: I said no such thing, you did. So AFAIC, you are arguing with yourself, not with me or my words. That, plus the fact that you are making claims with
by a4isms 4y ago
Sir/Madam:
I said no such thing, you did. So AFAIC, you are arguing with yourself, not with me or my words. That, plus the fact that you are making claims without any arguments, examples, or reasoning to back up your claims, suggests that for all your talk of “better information,” you are actually disinterested in better information prevailing.
Your own behaviour is doing a better job of illustrating my point than my words do! I will leave you here to carry on arguing with yourself.
- infamouscow 4y ago> Billions of people believe things on faith that have no empirical backing, and do so despite access to an unprecedented amount of scientific evidence to the contrary. We don't live in a technocracy. The crux of the matter is you don't get to decide what other people think or believe.
- a4isms 4y agoPlease do carry on spreading misinformation about what I think or advocate or believe. You’re doing a fine job of dancing with your own straw man. It seems that I called you out on making a claim you didn’t back up, and you are weaving some kind of conspiracy web around my motives and beliefs. That’s an ad hominem appeal to motive, and it’s just as terrible an argument as making a claim you decline to substantiate. For someone who claims that good information will drive out bad, you appear to have no interest in walking your talk. This thread has gone from tragedy to farce.