5 ms·
You can develop an intuition divorced from meaningless formulas. It goes without saying this proposed class wouldn’t be based around memorizing unmotivated for
by l33t2328 4y ago
You can develop an intuition divorced from meaningless formulas.
It goes without saying this proposed class wouldn’t be based around memorizing unmotivated formulas.
- teawrecks 4y agoBut how would you "motivate" the formulas without knowing where they came from? Why is this the formula we use and not something else? To go back to the car analogy, I know why I need an engine, you might even say I know how to use the engine, but if the engine dies or I want to use the engine for some other purpose, I'm not equipped to do anything. I don't have "literacy" with engines, I have rote memorization of a series of steps. I don't have enough information to know why the steps are what they are, nor could I know under what conditions the steps should change or what they should change to.
- l33t2328 4y agoJust don’t include formulas you can’t motivate simply. Will it result in students not knowing as many formulas? Of course, but who cares?
- leaflets2 4y agoSometimes they'll need formulas they don't understand (can't motivate) for doing work things? Then what? Are they going to incorrectly use anther one, a wrong one, because they understand it better? (Searching not where one lost the key, but where the light is stronger) Hmm, I wonder if you studied stats? It sounds as if you studied lots of math. I did long ago, mostly forgotten, and, hmm, I don't think there's a single real life useful probability function one can understand, without knowing the underlying calculus? Except for understanding in the sense of trusting the teacher. Which works pretty ok in medicine