3 ms·

Find me any examples that are even 10% of the banning of any posts relating to Hunter Biden before the election from the other side.

• eesmith 5y ago
  Do you understand my observation that pointing to that web site doesn't make your statement "646 on one side vs 0" meaningful? At least some of those posts are on topics besides Hunter Biden, like the image banned for implying that kissing one's grandkid on the lips is sexual. I don't think you want to get into that argument. Your reference lists "140 cases of Big Tech censoring people over the New York Post’s bombshell Hunter Biden story in late 2020". (I'm now curious about how brought up the Hunter Biden story. Was it 100% of cases that got blocked? 0.001% of cases?) As to your challenge, https://www.wired.co.uk/article/twitter-political-account-ban-us-mid-term-elections https://www.wired.co.uk/article/twitter-political-account-ba... says: "Twitter accounts run by activists linked to the Occupy movement have been suspended after the social network continued its attempted crackdown on bots and fake accounts. Around 80 activists with a collective following of five million people are thought to have had their accounts suspended." 80 > 14. But frankly, I don't really care. A company may exercise its First Amendment right of free association within broad limits. What I care about is not seeing people use bad arguments to support their point.