4 ms·
It's not quite as willy-nilly as that, as the FCC settlement required some controls to be placed on access to data, however a huge part of that effort requires
by fatnoah 5y ago
It's not quite as willy-nilly as that, as the FCC settlement required some controls to be placed on access to data, however a huge part of that effort requires manual review. That's manageable. What this doc shows (IMHO) is that the current manual approach won't work at all for a landscape where rules and regulations change frequently.
- dtagames 5y agoThat's not what the document says. It says the data is unlabeled at the "tens of thousands of points" of injection and that, without that labeling cannot be controlled in its access. It doesn't say the process fails because of manual reviews. The "changing legislation" that concerns them is the legislation which requires control over the data which the current system does not have (data about privacy and access). It also says that it will take them hundreds of people-years to re-architect and redeploy their systems into something that does have that kind of privacy labeling.