3 ms·
I'm not the OP but I'll have a go. 1. IP requires enforcement and commonly agreed upon principles. In a global economy different states will have different rul
by accurrent 4y ago
I'm not the OP but I'll have a go.
1. IP requires enforcement and commonly agreed upon principles. In a global economy different states will have different rules. We all know that there are rogue states and entities out there who may choose not to enforce IP rules. Furthermore IP enforcement requires money. Even in countries where rule of law is the norm, it is often the case where companies making more money have more power to bend the rules. Hence, using IP as a business model is unsustainable.
2. IP in its nature is not proprietary. Two people can arrive at the same conclusion therefore you can't actually "hide" any information successfully.
- watwut 4y agoThat sounds to me like speculation on why it might fail in the long term and not explaination why it clearly already failed. I am not arguing that copyright as exists now is some universal good. It just dont seem failed to me at all. It generates a lot of money. Countries that ostensibly dont respect it seem to be mostly poor - their people dont have money to pay much in the first place.