3 ms·
> They also make some performance claims towards the end of the article. essentially a marginal speed increase they think on json, but a much bigger speed incr
by jerrysievert 4y ago
> They also make some performance claims towards the end of the article.
essentially a marginal speed increase they think on json, but a much bigger speed increase (5x-100x they claim) if you switch to their native format ZNG.
if I'm switching formats completely, I'm not sure why I care about jq vs zq in json performance ...
- loeg 4y agoMarginally faster is better than marginally slower, at least. I agree the JSON use is probably more compelling than their ZNG thing.
- jerrysievert 4y ago> I agree the JSON use is probably more compelling than their ZNG thing. considering how much data I can already get via json (or converted to json via other json related standards such as geojson), there doesn't seem to be much of a compelling case to use ZNG. I'd love to hear different though!