4 ms·
> calling it 'fluff' is surely the mildest of sassy descriptions, no? On the contrary, "fluff" suggests that the piece has nothing to offer outside of the sour
by scoot 4y ago
> calling it 'fluff' is surely the mildest of sassy descriptions, no?
On the contrary, "fluff" suggests that the piece has nothing to offer outside of the source material.
- plaguepilled 4y agoNah, it just suggests that some of the article is superfluous, which I stand by. Like I said a comment or two up, its a good article, but doesn't contain enough of the meat.