> the point was to create a new reality regardless of the truth... Some people did that, sure. Others were genuine. For example, this tweet in cautious favor o

> the point was to create a new reality regardless of the truth... Some people did that, sure. Others were genuine. For example, this tweet in cautious favor of a new vaccine development got a Professor of haemostasis and thrombosis at the University of Sheffield banned, and even on appeal they made him delete the tweet: https://twitter.com/ProfMakris/status/1474068222550884367/photo/1 https://twitter.com/ProfMakris/status/1474068222550884367/ph... Many, many other cases of this sort exist, and there's no justification for it. Speaking of unwarranted - your assumptions about people's motives, to justify attacking and censoring them, are disturbing. Do you feel like that's a normal thing to do?