3 ms·
As a non-physicist and someone who struggles with quantum mechanical theories, doesn’t your analogy contain an ordered sequence or events? Is that not time (tha
by jonhohle 5y ago
As a non-physicist and someone who struggles with quantum mechanical theories, doesn’t your analogy contain an ordered sequence or events? Is that not time (that’s basically a vector clock, for example).
- pmontra 5y agoIt's even difficult to write without using time words. Let's try again. Status 1: B is entangled with A and not with C. Status 2: B is entangled with C and not with A. Perception: B moved from being spatially close to A to be close to C. Or the other way around. I agree that this could explain space but it doesn't seem to explain time. Why that entanglement changed and which one came first and why? I'm not the one that's going to explain that even at this very low level. Search for Susskind space entanglement and you should find something first hand.