Do you have a primary source for that? I don't mean news reports saying that, i mean actual legal documentation saying that's how it works? Because there's a lo

Do you have a primary source for that? I don't mean news reports saying that, i mean actual legal documentation saying that's how it works? Because there's a lot of misinformation going around, and a lot of new outlets confusing cause and effect. I find it hard to believe that would be the case, since it's needlessly discriminating against a single shareholder. The underlying game theory aspects mean that giving the hostile acquirer the warrants would be essentially irrelevant since they have no benefit in exercising them, while suffering the costs of doing so. In short, there's no point in preventing elon from being able to purchase additional shares from the company below the acquisition offer because it would just be a waste of money for him.