5 ms·
They don't; they want to take down the 99% of git.io links that are pointing to malware / phishing, and they don't want to spend all their time manually culling
by derefr 5y ago
They don't; they want to take down the 99% of git.io links that are pointing to malware / phishing, and they don't want to spend all their time manually culling them.
- charcircuit 5y agoThey could add a giant warning page where you have to copy and paste the link manually. There should still be some way to follow old links.
- dotancohen 5y agoThis would be the proper solution. The service could even just return an HTML page with a hyperlink instead of a 301 redirect.
- tinus_hn 5y agoOr require solving a captcha.