4 ms·
we already have "nameless" IP addresses, in which DNS is built on top of it as abstraction. using SHA256 is no better that using IPv6 IMO
by azophy_2 4y ago
we already have "nameless" IP addresses, in which DNS is built on top of it as abstraction. using SHA256 is no better that using IPv6 IMO
- webmaven 4y agoThere is probably a decent case to be made for having an indirection layer above IP addresses, even if they are as meaningless and unmemorizable as a hash: for portability (IP addresses are tied to the host infra provider), load balancing, etc.
- quickthrower2 4y agoExcept you have your ownership in the blockchain allowing you to mutate the IP address. I don’t know if you can get a guaranteed for life IPv6. And who dishes them out. It is centralised.