4 ms·
They have a habit of doing it(for years/decades) and it would really help them if people couldn't rely on other sources of energy than what they're selling. So
by FrenchDevRemote 4y ago
They have a habit of doing it(for years/decades) and it would really help them if people couldn't rely on other sources of energy than what they're selling.
So, who else?Who has a motive and the capabilities to do this?
- ajsnigrutin 4y agoI mean.. what does russia gain? Even worse political relations? Germany will fix it system in a day or two, and then what? Does anyone actually expect them to ditch wind power and buy russian gas after russia hacking them? Realistically... by stirring the shit up in europe, the country that gains the most is.. well.. USA. Do something, blame russia, make EU economy worse, worsen the relations, make european countries stop production due to energy crisis, sell them american products, and if things get even worse, sell weapons, maybe even to both sides if things get desparate enough, watch europe destroyed again while their own economy gets a great boost.
- geeB 4y agoThe same could be said about the invasion in the first place though, after the worsening from 2014, even if they managed to pull off the initial plan. It seems more of a response/warning to the sending of weapons that has a tiny bit of teeth but not enough to escalate further.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- CorrectHorseBat 4y agoWe can ask this question about nearly every action Russia took after it was clear the war wasn't going their way, yet they did do them. If they consider themselves at war with NATO this attack does make sense.