2 ms·
Here you go, see references within as well. Apparently the DOE did some studies about the effects of nuclear weapons on reactors and oil refineries in the earl
by photochemsyn 5y ago
Here you go, see references within as well. Apparently the DOE did some studies about the effects of nuclear weapons on reactors and oil refineries in the early 1970s:
> "...the staggering radiological consequences of destruction of a nuclear reactor by a nuclear weapon...put the radiologic damage potential of a fair-sized nuclear arsenal into the hands of any nation or terrorist group with a single, ten-kiloton bomb (170)"
https://rmi.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/RMI_Brittle_Power_Energy_Strategy_Natl_Security_1982.pdf https://rmi.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/RMI_Brittle_Power...
- robocat 5y agoThank you. The relevant section starts at page 161. The book suggests the worst case scenarios: 1. vaporisation of the core* by a small highly targeted terrorist nuclear bomb (most relevant to reactors near large population centres). 2. vaporisation of the core* by a larger nuclear bomb. A standard meltdown (a la Fukushima or 3 Mile Island) would likely not be a problem (relative to the explosion of the nuclear missile itself). Can a nuclear missile from a sub cause vaporisation of the core or stored spent rods? I am sure the military wonks have the answer, but it is a hard question to answer as a civilian. The book you referenced doesn’t answer that question (it hypothesises some worst case scenarios, and it does not investigate what could be realistic scenarios based on realistic limitations). * or stored spent rods I presume.