4 ms·
I think the point is that you can strongly disagree with a statement without painting its author as incompetent. Regardless of whether that was the intent, that
by saxonww 5y ago
I think the point is that you can strongly disagree with a statement without painting its author as incompetent. Regardless of whether that was the intent, that's certainly how it reads.
- twayt 5y agoGoing one step further, you can strongly disagree with a statement without attaching a value judgement to the other person's argument. In spirit, this rule should hold even if you aren't attacking the author directly but are disparaging the value of their perspective. That is simply unnecessary and you can just refute the point directly.