3 ms·
Is it really so badly worded that you could complain about a teacher teaching he and she? That’s going to be fun when the trolls start filing lawsuits.
by TimPC 4y ago
Is it really so badly worded that you could complain about a teacher teaching he and she? That’s going to be fun when the trolls start filing lawsuits.
- MisterBastahrd 4y agoQuote: "Classroom instruction by school personnel or third parties on sexual orientation or gender identity may not occur in kindergarten through grade 3 or in a manner that is not age appropriate or developmentally appropriate for students in accordance with state standards." They purposefully had to make it this vague so it could stand even the minimum of court scrutiny... unfortunately for them, the wording is impossible without explicitly stating what the purpose of the language of the bill is actually for, so... Every child is they/them and / or "students," not "boys and girls."
- TimPC 4y agoI think they would make the argument that the simple and wrong "boys are he, girls are she" is age-appropriate and "developmentally appropriate for students in accordance with state standards". This is a bad bill that severely infringes on transgender and LGBTQ rights.
- MisterBastahrd 4y ago"Classroom instruction by school personnel or third parties on sexual orientation or gender identity may not occur in kindergarten through grade 3" That's pretty explicit. What comes after is an addendum for other grades, not K-3.