4 ms·
I think the difference here is in "corporate structure". I mean Bezos and Musk are both extraordinary people - but say Bezos employees about 1 million people a
by lifeisstillgood 5y ago
I think the difference here is in "corporate structure". I mean Bezos and Musk are both extraordinary people - but say Bezos employees about 1 million people and is worth about 150bn - why is the world structured so that each employee "gives" Bezos 150 grand?
There are other ways to structure our corporations, our tax and investment incentives. The Early Victoria British style of corporate structure worked so it got copied naturally. And I am not saying there are easy fixes. But co-operative movements were born at similar times. One day we will see VCs funding co-op unicorns and the world will look differently
- mgfist 5y agoSimplicity, speed, responsibility, authority. A lot of reasons why having a clear hierarchy makes sense. How do you assign blame in a co-op that makes bad decisions?
- travisgriggs 5y agoI can’t tell if you’re doing /s or not. If a group of people performs/delivers poorly, how effective is it to assign blame to one select member? It may be efficient, but I’m not sure it’s effective.
- travisgriggs 5y agoYes. Co-op was/is the word that I’m looking for. I love co-ops when they work.