3 ms·
So because Saudi prince + rich investors are bad, it's better to have one centibillionaire own it instead?
by andrepd 5y ago
So because Saudi prince + rich investors are bad, it's better to have one centibillionaire own it instead?
- brigandish 5y ago> it's better to have one centibillionaire own it instead Did I write that? I find it endlessly fascinating when people think in black and white and come back with some kind of false dilemma because I was able to make an entirely legitimate and obvious criticism. I've a better question: is there anyone worse to own Twitter than the Saudi royal family? I think so but there aren't many.