3 ms·
Not for me. Bootstrap is very mature, has sane UX, is adaptable, has a good balance between general styles and utility classes. I find that Tailwind clutters yo
by erokar 4y ago
Not for me. Bootstrap is very mature, has sane UX, is adaptable, has a good balance between general styles and utility classes. I find that Tailwind clutters your HTML and I fail to see the benefit over writing pure CSS in isolated components in a framework like e.g. Svelte. The reason I would use a CSS framework in the first place is to avoid having to write everything from scratch myself. All (the free parts of) Tailwind affords is an indirect way of writing styles using classes. In that case you might as well bite the bullet and learn CSS properly.
- todotask 4y agoThink about it this way, most developers should have been familiar with CSS, utility classes is a shorthand that make its easy to remember and find user defined class if you have tried Tailwind 3, I found it solve all of my checklists. Like Bootstrap way, you can still define that with Tailwind classes either in input.css with @apply directive (abstract out utility classes from HTML) or Tailwind configuration. It’s a way to speed up our development.