3 ms·
Most people are focusing on modern reasons. The historical reason is that when the internet was being developed, public key encryption hadn't been invented yet
by biot 15y ago
Most people are focusing on modern reasons. The historical reason is that when the internet was being developed, public key encryption hadn't been invented yet. The 1960s and early 1970s was when the internet was created and it was only until the mid 1970s that public key encryption came about. The problems of secure key exchange hadn't been solved at the time. Even if those problems had been solved, clock speeds were measured in megahertz [edit: sometimes kilohertz]; every clock cycle mattered.
Fast forward to today and this legacy has remained. Many protocols are being retrofitted to support encryption, but it's similar to why railroad tracks are the width they are: Roman chariots used the same width.
Additionally, don't discount developer laziness. It's much easier to debug a plaintext stream than an encrypted one.
- aaronbrethorst 15y ago> Roman chariots http://www.snopes.com/history/american/gauge.asp http://www.snopes.com/history/american/gauge.asp
- biot 15y agoThanks. It looks like I'll need to find a new "historical inertia" analogy to use. Suggestions welcomed.
- DLWormwood 15y agoRead the Snopes article in it's entirety. It's still "technically true;" it just didn't happen with deliberate or accidental intent. "Inertia" is the perfect word in such a case.