> Technically true, but without context, easily misunderstood. It's practically true, and there is nothing to "misunderstand" there, unless you try to create s

> Technically true, but without context, easily misunderstood. It's practically true, and there is nothing to "misunderstand" there, unless you try to create such a misunderstanding by claiming this comes out of some kind of "general ban", when it's actually a very specific ban German states started putting in place only recently [0]. Case in point; > Since Russia attack on Ukraine is an illegal act, it's illegal to promote or advocate for the war, and this includes the Z symbol. The US attack on Iraq was also illegal, yet that didn't lead to German states banning the V symbol for Victory or any other US symbols, or US state media getting banned. Which is not the only example of how most about this is purely political and not in any way based on impartial interpretation and application of laws for "human rights and justice" [1]. [0] https://www.zeit.de/politik/deutschland/2022-03/z-symbol-russland-ukraine-krieg-bundeslaender-verbot https://www.zeit.de/politik/deutschland/2022-03/z-symbol-rus... [1] https://foreignpolicy.com/2020/12/08/germany-could-have-delivered-justice-for-civilian-drone-strike-victims-it-failed/ https://foreignpolicy.com/2020/12/08/germany-could-have-deli...